Children’s Literature: Then and Now

The boys and I recently read A Bear Called Paddington (a fuller review in my forthcoming Reading Round-Up), and I was struck by the complex sentence structure and vocabulary of this book published in 1958—it seemed so much richer than much of the literature for young children today. My impressions were no doubt heightened as we were re-reading the first of the Magic Tree House series, Dinosaurs Before Dark, at the same time. (Gareth is just starting to sit through chapter books; I read the series with Daegan a couple years ago).

 image image

But judge for yourself. Here’s a bit of Paddington, written more than 50 years ago, paragraph breaks as they appear on the page:

Paddington settled back in his armchair, wiped a smear of butter carefully from his whiskers, put his paws behind his head and stretched out his toes towards the fire. He liked an audience, especially when he was warm and the world seemed a nice place.

“I was brought up in Darkest Peru,” he began. “By my Aunt Lucy. She’s the one that lives in a home for retired bears in Lima.” He closed his eyes thoughtfully.

A hush fell over the room and everyone waited expectantly. After a while, when nothing happened, they began to get restless. Mr. Brown coughed loudly. “It doesn’t seem a very exciting story,” he said impatiently.

And here’s a bit from Dinosaurs Before Dark, written in 1992, again with ‘paragraph’ breaks as they appear on the page:

“I wish we would go back to Frog Creek,” said Jack.

Nothing happened.

“I wish—“

“Wait. You were looking at a picture in the dinosaur book. Remember?”

The dinosaur book.

Jack groaned. “Oh, no. I left the book and my pack on the hill. I have to go back.”

“Oh, forget it.” said Annie.

“I can’t,” said Jack. The book doesn’t belong to us. Plus my notebook’s in my pack. With all my notes.”

Hurry!” said Annie.

Jack hurried down the rope ladder.

He leaped to the ground.

He raced past the Pteranodon, through the ferns, through the tall grass, and up the hill.

He looked down.

There was his pack, lying on the ground. On top of it was the dinosaur book.

But now the valley below was filled with Anatosauruses. All standing guard around the nests.

Now don’t get me wrong; we quite enjoy the Magic Tree House series. It’s a really easy series for getting into chapter books, as your kids quickly become familiar with the characters and the format. It is a gentle introduction to a wide range of topics and time periods, from dinosaurs to Shakespeare to Ancient Egypt. But it is clear to me that something has changed in the way humans, including children, use language in past 50 or so years. I leave it up to you to decide if it is a change for the better, the worse, or simply the inevitable.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 10th, 2010 at 8:45 pm and is filed under books, this and that. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “Children’s Literature: Then and Now”

  1. Kez Says:

    We’ve been reading Enid Blyton books as a read-aloud lately, and yes I agree – the language is so much more sophisticated. And from what I read once, she was considered ‘twaddle’ in her time!

  2. Tiffany Says:

    Absolutely. Couldn’t agree more. We’ve been reading old classics and Enid Blyton etc….. MUCH better language and sentence structure, better pacing and what have you. I had heard a while ago that in the recent past newspapers and the media in general was supposed to be presented in a way that 12 year olds could follow and comprehend. Today that age is 6. Yes. We are absolutely dumbing down our society.

    Ick.

  3. Educating Risa » Blog Archive » Reading Round-Up Week 7 Says:

    [...] it, in addition to the gentle humour, was the rich sentence structure and vocabulary. More on this here. Stone Girl Bone Girl (Canada) (US) is the story of Mary Anning, who as a child was one [...]

  4. Amanda Says:

    I totally agree! We love PB around here – I grew up reading him and he really is my favourite bear. Winnie is a close second. I enjoy reading PB to my kids again and again.

    Jack & Annie get on my nerves and I hate to think I’ll have to read them again to Lilly when she’s a bit older. I like them as jumping off points. For example, we are currently reading Polar Bears & the Arctic and then we’ll do a lapbook on the arctic. But as a piece of literature? I’m not so sure. If Jack says “Oh, man” one more time I may just throw the book across the room.

  5. Risa Says:

    I personally found the line ‘”Hurry!” said Annie’ quite disappointing. I can understand wanting to keep the vocabulary simple if you are envisioning kids reading these books to themselves as first chapter books, rather than having an adult or older sibling read to them, but come on! ‘”Hurry!” _yelled_ Annie’ wouldn’t exactly be a huge stretch, would it? And the sentence fragments that are not part of someone’s speech–e.g. “The dinosaur book.”–also bother me as our kids look to what they read as models for how to write. And IMNSHO, using complete sentences isn’t asking too much!

  6. Magic and Mayhem Says:

    I think in a way it’s apples and oranges.

    I love Paddington and still have my set from my own childhood (very dog-eared!) and my kids are now reading the books. The whole Paddington series was something like 5 books (or my set, anyway) and the MT series is nearing 100. The MT books are designed to be quick, easy reads for younger kids and are turned out just as fast. I also think that Paddington was meant to be a read-aloud or for older kids, where MT books are written so that younger kids can read them themselves.

    There are still lots of wonderful books for children that are written nowadays with better plots, narration, vocabulary, etc. Back in Paddington’s day there was PLENTY of twaddle too, don’t forget. :)

Leave a Reply